Monday, May 29, 2006

Democratic Nature of Cuba

A common misconception of the Island in Cuba is that it is undemocratic. In this post, I will examine democracy in Cuba. I'll begin by quoting the Cuban Constitution.

Electoral Process of 1992 Cuban Constitution:

ARTICLE 131. All citizens, with the legal capacity to do so, have the right to take part in the leadership of the state, directly or through their elected representatives to the bodies of People’s Power, and to participate, for this purpose and as prescribed by law, in the periodic elections and people’s referendums through free, equal and secret vote. Every voter has only one vote.

ARTICLE 132. All Cubans over 16 years of age, men and women alike, have the right to vote except those who:

a) are mentally disabled and have been declared so by court;
b) have committed a crime and because of this have lost the right to vote.

ARTICLE 133. All Cuban citizens, men and women alike, who have full political rights can be elected.

If the election is for deputies to the National Assembly of People’s Power they must be more than 18 years old.

ARTICLE 134. Members of the Revolutionary Armed Forces and other military institutions of the nation have the right to elect and be elected, just like any other citizen.

ARTICLE 135. The law determines the number of delegates that make up each of the Provincial and Municipal Assemblies, in proportion to the number of people who live in each of the regions into which, for electoral purposes, the country is divided.

The delegates to the Provincial and Municipal Assemblies are elected by the voters through free, direct and secret vote. Moreover, the law regulates the procedure for their election.

ARTICLE 136. In order for deputies or delegates to be considered elected they must get more than half the number of valid votes cast in the electoral districts.

If this does not happen, or in cases of vacant posts, the law regulates the procedure to be followed.
http://www.cubanet.org/ref/dis/const_92_e.htm

Democratic Process:

"The Cuban National Assembly deals with legislative and constitutional matters, has 609 members who serve for five years. Up to 50 per cent are chosen from previously elected provincial and municipal delegates (elected locally for 2½ year terms) and the rest are chosen by national candidate commissions (from which PCC is excluded) in a process which takes many months and involves consultations with the major organizations representing millions of people, such as the trade unions, the women's federation, the small farmers unions, the student and teacher federations, and professional, health care and other associations."
http://bad.eserver.org/issues/2004/70/crumpacker.html

This excerpt shows a process that doesn't favor the Communist Party in Cuba and uncontrolled by Castro himself. A one man dictatorship in Cuba is quite impossible with so many people in the National Assembly. The only possible dictatorship would be a Proletarian one.

"There is no campaigning in Cuba, the candidates do not promote themselves and money is not a factor their election or decision making. Their biographies, including photos, education, work experience and other matters are posted conspicuously throughout their permanent, unchanging residential districts for months before the elections and details are supplied on request by the election commissions. They usually serve only one term, and most of them have previously been elected by constituents who know them personally or by reputation as to truly represent the common interest. They are not career politicians, they must have frequent meetings with constituents (called "accountability sessions") and they are subject to recall at all times. Where expert information is necessary, it is supplied by special commission or workers' parliaments rather than lobbyists, and proposed legislation (such as the recent imposition of an income tax on some) is voted on, up or down, in order of presentation. The peoples' representatives make the decisions, and once made, they move on to new decisions. In the elections held January 2003 over 93 per cent of eligible Cubans voted valid ballots, electing a National Assembly which truly represents their common interest, without the intervention of electoral parties."
http://bad.eserver.org/issues/2004/70/crumpacker.html

Cuba's "campaigning" process is far ore democratic than any capitalist nation, including the United States and Great Britain. Money influences Capitalist politics to a huge degree and degrades the democratic process to a point of blatant wealth dictatorship.

The usual one-term politician is quite democratic. Career politicians in the House of Representatives have a re-election rate in the upper 90 percent. Such high re-election rates deem rather undemocratic unless Americans firmly believe that their government is doing a good job. I'll let you decide if this is true...

93% voter turn out is incredibly high and shows a great interest in politics amongst the Cuban populous that is not matched in the so-called beacons of democracy. Lower class Americans don't vote because voting doesn't change their situation; but by these numbers the Cuban people believe that their vote actually matters.

4 Comments:

Blogger Chris Palmer said...

A vote in itself is not democratic. Choice is democratic.

Until 2003, Cuba had not had an election since 1948. However, when elections were called in 2002/3 the only party you could vote for was the Communist party - a bit like in Germany during the 1940's where you could only vote for the Nazi party, or in the USSR where you could only vote for the Communist party. All other Cuban political parties are illegal.

As Joseph Stalin once said, "It's not who votes that counts; but who counts the votes."

Cuban is a dictatorship. It's a fact. Don't believe otherwise.

5/30/2006 3:00 PM  
Blogger D_Bokk said...

Do you have a source? Let me guess, the source comes out of Miami? I've provided sources showing the exact opposite of what you claim, including the constitution.

Bourgeois parties are naturally eliminated from the election process. It would be the equivalent of Americans electing as their president King George III. Why go through a bloody revolution and have no radical change?

My sources show quite clearly that the people nominated for the election are those whom the small communities select. Not to mention 15% of the Cuban population is part of the PCC. With such high numbers of politically active party members I believe it to be natural that many party members would be elected.

To add onto that, Fidel: The Untold Story (2002) had a Cuban who was an independent and elected to the National Assembly. Also, as my source claimed, politicians generally only serve one year. Your claim would mean that Cuba had no leadership between 1949 and 2003.

5/30/2006 6:05 PM  
Blogger Chris Palmer said...

Your source was created in 1992, and was therefore not in effect before that period.

You think that all the people who have joined the Cuban Communist party will do so because they believe in the cause or politics? How foolish. Like the Soviet Union, many joined the party for the perks and so not as to fall under suspicion themselves.

It is clearly not worthing debating with you since you will not see sense and your current ideology blinds you to the obvious truth. Perhaps when you're a little older, you might grow out of these habits and come to see sense like many others have. Perhaps you will not. Time will tell.

5/31/2006 11:02 AM  
Blogger D_Bokk said...

The first constitution under Castro was basically the same and in fact 1992 is just reforming/amending the one of 1976.

Again with the baseless accusations. Do you have proof to back up your claim that the Cuban Communist Party is filled with opportunists? Recently the Party expelled a high-level member who was corrupt; I doubt that the party is littered with bad apples. A few maybe.

Not worth debating? Clearly you're at a loss of evidence. The only proof you can find comes directly from the mouth of the US State Department. Clearly you're blinded by the anti-communist propaganda that was forced down the throat of all citizens of the so-called free world.

Enough with the age discrimination, you're no better than me. Those who are unable to argue against communism frequently use the age excuse, which is the case right here.

Good luck "debating" someone who completely agrees with you; because apparently those are the only people you like to "debate" with. Hey, you're in luck - every politician, at least in America, are part of the same party. The Republocrats. Is Britain different? I doubt it, these mock democracies under capitalism always fail to represent the Proletariat.

5/31/2006 6:41 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home